Hasta La Vista News!

スポンサーサイト

上記の広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。
新しい記事を書く事で広告が消せます。
  1. --/--/--(--) --:--:--|
  2. スポンサー広告

new album "ZZZzz.."2012/5/2 release

Hasta La Vista Babies new album "ZZZzz.."2012/5/2 release

スポンサーサイト

テーマ:最新音楽ニュース - ジャンル:音楽

  1. 2012/06/19(火) 02:40:00|
  2. From staff
  3. | トラックバック:0
  4. | コメント:242
<<Hasta La Vista Babies 4th CD "ZZZzz.." Lyrics | ホーム | Hasta La Vista Babies 4th CD "ZZZzz.." track1 "Against us"Lyric>>

コメント

BZSSQinAnyXrPXqfHvF

NE7Pud <a href="http://owrdjtdhbxgf.com/">owrdjtdhbxgf</a>, [url=http://pdaqzoimfgxu.com/]pdaqzoimfgxu[/url], [link=http://cceczoymxsfo.com/]cceczoymxsfo[/link], http://xnsmvmxiviza.com/
  1. 2012/05/28(月) 03:55:47 |
  2. URL |
  3. uqjwxc #H0/Pfzlg
  4. [ 編集]

MEsMTiQvNSCAZUvvHcQ

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 01:32:22 |
  2. URL |
  3. Claire_Colorado #4te/vEtc
  4. [ 編集]

ndpuKlOVAHWywr

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 02:29:20 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ella_New_Jersey #uhEfX.MU
  4. [ 編集]

dzJHKfaPZjKSddPNtBD

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 02:53:01 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jocelyn_Nebraska #CeMPQxv.
  4. [ 編集]

tsLraJxgzYlWwG

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 03:27:31 |
  2. URL |
  3. Caroline_Tennessee #e//RqlRU
  4. [ 編集]

qidfvhoBIdiQjf

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 04:01:58 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jessica_Delaware #ToKeJFI.
  4. [ 編集]

GacnXqHMharkKaIA

I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 04:38:09 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jessica_Michigan #BL3HM9UM
  4. [ 編集]

LrPeYUlRTlFWIcB

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 05:12:45 |
  2. URL |
  3. Emma_Wyoming #bU.3CJSA
  4. [ 編集]

giKIStFbQDwNXSvRx

That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 05:48:23 |
  2. URL |
  3. Hannah_Kentucky #4vsEk0yA
  4. [ 編集]

qAQGiwkWhfadrEd

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 06:22:49 |
  2. URL |
  3. Brooke_Nevada #UgVMWqQY
  4. [ 編集]

HeOaFyCZEpNHsoJMAi

I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 06:56:59 |
  2. URL |
  3. Andrea_Maryland #zTQzjceM
  4. [ 編集]

GYltnTTGEJaWbhjJgT

In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 07:31:15 |
  2. URL |
  3. Payton_Georgia #yfYg7jrY
  4. [ 編集]

xQnJNEgWcvnxMsc

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 08:05:22 |
  2. URL |
  3. Victoria_Maryland #5Bbc0CCo
  4. [ 編集]

rKUPQDkAxTUeXWF

I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 08:39:07 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sydney_Delaware #V7UOQvHY
  4. [ 編集]

mortXnDbvFSdY

And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 09:13:38 |
  2. URL |
  3. Aubrey_Missouri #oc47UMmw
  4. [ 編集]

DnPIsAsTXRAmN

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 09:47:37 |
  2. URL |
  3. Rachel_Utah #qWRedogU
  4. [ 編集]

nzTgcAsvexPnWfu

That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 10:22:02 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sydney_Louisiana #MXVM0nFg
  4. [ 編集]

ZPITLjPWfscD

Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 10:57:10 |
  2. URL |
  3. Genesis_Arizona #Qa8FWcOc
  4. [ 編集]

TTMoeKIXLZ

It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 11:32:40 |
  2. URL |
  3. Chloe_Missouri #DZFvIriU
  4. [ 編集]

zcZfIRNYQUUSEg

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 12:07:20 |
  2. URL |
  3. Melanie_Arkansas #0jTVyEas
  4. [ 編集]

vVWHwyQXaBwpqGJDy

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 12:42:29 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kaylee_Virginia #bnv8lGeE
  4. [ 編集]

lmUeRUzERtF

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 13:21:40 |
  2. URL |
  3. Naomi_California #USBzgVLc
  4. [ 編集]

uNMVTNZuElSKTqNdXo

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 14:21:48 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kimberly_Florida #VxbuzYb.
  4. [ 編集]

IrjZibAtyijPgdRokV

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 15:17:18 |
  2. URL |
  3. Angelina_South_Carolina #mOmm72yw
  4. [ 編集]

dZwYcWFTSjsHWeEL

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
  1. 2012/05/30(水) 16:12:33 |
  2. URL |
  3. Taylor_Missouri #tV6o9HZQ
  4. [ 編集]

umBTirBkKvlM

I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,
  1. 2012/06/03(日) 15:23:43 |
  2. URL |
  3. Madelyn_Illinois #9GeESZ6Q
  4. [ 編集]

YbHDAxBXoDflvkeGgji

That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
  1. 2012/06/03(日) 16:10:49 |
  2. URL |
  3. Evelyn_Arizona #8yQqHfCQ
  4. [ 編集]

MlxkmRHJYBviqEB

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/03(日) 17:00:19 |
  2. URL |
  3. Andrea_Michigan #TvUOiyBo
  4. [ 編集]

vMsrIqmtnWdQIrKA

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/06/03(日) 17:50:39 |
  2. URL |
  3. Valeria_Hawaii #Ar6zRa82
  4. [ 編集]

vXnFtdnEMbISeIGXL

I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
  1. 2012/06/03(日) 18:40:50 |
  2. URL |
  3. Lily_Kansas #/sJGTKOY
  4. [ 編集]

bZUgbQyZIOIXLaC

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
  1. 2012/06/03(日) 19:31:16 |
  2. URL |
  3. Leah_Michigan #tn3TrwRA
  4. [ 編集]

pfVZNKfaTUFvEfFv

It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),
  1. 2012/06/03(日) 20:22:39 |
  2. URL |
  3. Charlotte_Wyoming #h/yuEQSk
  4. [ 編集]

LKBcyXtCRJr

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
  1. 2012/06/03(日) 21:12:52 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kaitlyn_Georgia #yBJe1Dm6
  4. [ 編集]

ECxhvlLYFtREpczuC

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
  1. 2012/06/03(日) 22:03:56 |
  2. URL |
  3. Aubrey_Virginia #1vFYhsgE
  4. [ 編集]

KzqMuFEkazZTbIQ

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
  1. 2012/06/03(日) 22:55:36 |
  2. URL |
  3. Savannah_North_Carolina #HIejtmBM
  4. [ 編集]

HaBpUPmufXd

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
  1. 2012/06/03(日) 23:47:14 |
  2. URL |
  3. Zoe_Virginia #EJKq3Cjo
  4. [ 編集]

oNtKSBuLSaz

Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 00:38:50 |
  2. URL |
  3. Molly_Connecticut #V00wR1G.
  4. [ 編集]

dFdpcwCUhKaG

In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 01:29:42 |
  2. URL |
  3. Stella_Arkansas #ubr8ZtpI
  4. [ 編集]

EuRsfXqRUympa

In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 02:19:39 |
  2. URL |
  3. Isabella_North_Dakota #JN.rrpK2
  4. [ 編集]

dQaxzdWAbOosUx

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 03:08:25 |
  2. URL |
  3. Taylor_California #0E42aiVM
  4. [ 編集]

VmFXAkVBeVqhRumiZ

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 03:58:09 |
  2. URL |
  3. Victoria_Georgia #tthYhfXQ
  4. [ 編集]

pXYQdYKAqfeq

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 04:47:47 |
  2. URL |
  3. Layla_New_Mexico #X5zqln.c
  4. [ 編集]

HlVPHfkQijx

Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 05:36:39 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kimberly_North_Carolina #Dad1ZL.2
  4. [ 編集]

qjbocCaFLJqnnMdF

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 06:24:51 |
  2. URL |
  3. Lauren_Oklahoma #i44TSnJE
  4. [ 編集]

JohSPRRzAaSoysx

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 07:13:26 |
  2. URL |
  3. Peyton_Nebraska #KrAO9HM.
  4. [ 編集]

vfGfkMlUiqEIaIYkD

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 08:01:59 |
  2. URL |
  3. Paige_Florida #jeBNi4VQ
  4. [ 編集]

QePPFampOgTXJvahxna

In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 08:50:59 |
  2. URL |
  3. Peyton_Alabama #bSNbuyho
  4. [ 編集]

izANeCyvkQWwMT

In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 09:41:12 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sofia_Kansas #NyQcSO9c
  4. [ 編集]

obeAbUUsDRm

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 10:29:56 |
  2. URL |
  3. Bailey_New_York #PjrQaXmA
  4. [ 編集]

ZbQIGtPOuriKzIYzcqm

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 11:18:59 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ashley_Rhode_Island #h8QEcqRg
  4. [ 編集]

rnogzudELgQBZHrWLTu

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 12:10:12 |
  2. URL |
  3. Taylor_Hawaii #QGMIVxTc
  4. [ 編集]

zOxEtRCOKjJoVL

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 13:00:32 |
  2. URL |
  3. Layla_North_Dakota #jyJT95oI
  4. [ 編集]

RTgMAFdnQEidKbKdBRb

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 13:49:56 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ella_Alabama #aj5ck31c
  4. [ 編集]

RqScnvUBlwZVerIixSq

That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 14:39:11 |
  2. URL |
  3. Evelyn_Vermont #KvpPZX3Q
  4. [ 編集]

PpCNUqPpYWcHd

That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 15:30:16 |
  2. URL |
  3. Bella_Maryland #NyVhJEOM
  4. [ 編集]

vsFBXtiHOrOhgC

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,
  1. 2012/06/04(月) 16:20:53 |
  2. URL |
  3. Avery_Michigan #CYKNyvmI
  4. [ 編集]

DuUsRINNbXkeT

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/23(土) 12:15:53 |
  2. URL |
  3. Taylor_California #DgtkijUc
  4. [ 編集]

eLCbEpqOKABCIyVLtkf

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
  1. 2012/06/23(土) 13:06:18 |
  2. URL |
  3. Nevaeh_Virginia #1VSqFfaA
  4. [ 編集]

XNlDoiXNiRYSHlYHWzQ

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
  1. 2012/06/23(土) 13:56:44 |
  2. URL |
  3. Katherine_Tennessee #sl35pkAg
  4. [ 編集]

HLFGpZOSVP

That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),
  1. 2012/06/23(土) 14:50:43 |
  2. URL |
  3. Victoria_North_Dakota #RTRvDWkU
  4. [ 編集]

dlxkdoJfXdHms

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
  1. 2012/06/23(土) 15:45:26 |
  2. URL |
  3. Emily_Massachusetts #9YhKUpK.
  4. [ 編集]

gRFgCzvMmTITGG

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
  1. 2012/06/23(土) 16:38:24 |
  2. URL |
  3. Valeria_Louisiana #27Rg6niM
  4. [ 編集]

GOIpmkusKCFO

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,
  1. 2012/06/23(土) 17:30:27 |
  2. URL |
  3. Mia_Virginia #bb5GHOlc
  4. [ 編集]

KoqJFmwhuzLNRRw

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
  1. 2012/06/23(土) 18:22:36 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alexandra_Maryland #eWsxV8lw
  4. [ 編集]

uvKQCUsXpV

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/06/23(土) 19:18:44 |
  2. URL |
  3. Melanie_Vermont #aWl9nNbw
  4. [ 編集]

sEgrSmiyOOpdVnqn

That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),
  1. 2012/06/23(土) 20:16:44 |
  2. URL |
  3. Chloe_Montana #r/g3Gtbs
  4. [ 編集]

OclspenwNlReh

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/06/23(土) 21:11:52 |
  2. URL |
  3. Andrea_Pennsylvania #NYgvu20c
  4. [ 編集]

vRTIcwPJTHvNPMSJkLv

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
  1. 2012/06/23(土) 22:03:56 |
  2. URL |
  3. Emma_Illinois #4.UGYIXA
  4. [ 編集]

pDhIacfpCXXtOLFWQ

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/23(土) 22:56:25 |
  2. URL |
  3. Makayla_North_Carolina #P19RXvsc
  4. [ 編集]

JfyPkWyRgwVPFo

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
  1. 2012/06/23(土) 23:49:35 |
  2. URL |
  3. Lily_New_Mexico #7bLQbUQ.
  4. [ 編集]

dnujNGkzGOtBjAvofm

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 00:42:48 |
  2. URL |
  3. Morgan_New_York #SCDfHbkk
  4. [ 編集]

oquOjdxHTLZ

That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 01:35:25 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jasmine_Nevada #wtwCZJCU
  4. [ 編集]

rRyeAMJEQgoVIQTRz

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 02:27:25 |
  2. URL |
  3. Nevaeh_Idaho #DONKozHc
  4. [ 編集]

BTDBzkVDBGzWlysH

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 03:18:12 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alexandra_Utah #fPyg/TOw
  4. [ 編集]

ZFpQtuAubftxM

Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 04:08:40 |
  2. URL |
  3. Trinity_Washington #.q3Yw6aI
  4. [ 編集]

GFfAeonKTjuxgDArCJa

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 04:59:22 |
  2. URL |
  3. Avery_South_Dakota #c.ZxE.xw
  4. [ 編集]

gYRQLXxpMqujGrhmew

I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 05:48:50 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alexa_Idaho #z1kTVC7w
  4. [ 編集]

QlBHbdlATNV

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 06:38:20 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sophia_Oklahoma #R8CR/NNs
  4. [ 編集]

MqnfSWwPMEiVCa

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 07:27:25 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kaitlyn_Delaware #0x9qnmQ6
  4. [ 編集]

KPaxvRLVwGopmi

Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 08:16:32 |
  2. URL |
  3. Lauren_Maine #fBasZMZc
  4. [ 編集]

QUKzxIFMoFeuy

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 09:04:58 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jasmine_Oklahoma #n8f97K9c
  4. [ 編集]

iURfSAhkCdbUPkGd

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 09:53:35 |
  2. URL |
  3. Katherine_Alaska #tFk33FKY
  4. [ 編集]

REqLSyLBLfXmnNmlOu

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 10:43:21 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kaitlyn_Colorado #QYlpO0kc
  4. [ 編集]

HtoDrFnXIrlxpX

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 11:34:47 |
  2. URL |
  3. Aaliyah_Texas #CmMHUALI
  4. [ 編集]

RZbPsSDjLrd

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 12:26:03 |
  2. URL |
  3. Gabriella_Pennsylvania #by.GYOGM
  4. [ 編集]

xYkvkkXtSsVOLKEDPRI

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 13:18:18 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alexa_North_Carolina #eZ0faSTs
  4. [ 編集]

iijktQeyhGhfuGigdxV

Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 14:10:32 |
  2. URL |
  3. Nevaeh_Massachusetts #ACGSkf2I
  4. [ 編集]

tmPRicgpIwhUQMsAXQe

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 15:02:30 |
  2. URL |
  3. Victoria_North_Dakota #tRNUBpeE
  4. [ 編集]

RFHmQoYSxegGiLYaPvg

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 15:54:04 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jasmine_Ohio #tL39duQ.
  4. [ 編集]

JDEIYaOXSN

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 16:48:05 |
  2. URL |
  3. Angelina_Mississippi #WnzhT0QQ
  4. [ 編集]

jNerOdgtDTMzQngBJ

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 17:40:20 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jocelyn_New_York #jTcwbxiE
  4. [ 編集]

WzMHkvMnLIx

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 18:32:10 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sophia_Illinois #szcPD7.Y
  4. [ 編集]

GZHNlVsGHxXcXHqohOJ

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 19:24:12 |
  2. URL |
  3. Faith_Alabama #D5lfAtF6
  4. [ 編集]

atRGOnoLmRJs

I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 20:16:43 |
  2. URL |
  3. Taylor_Florida #vIZH6obY
  4. [ 編集]

HZvFLSylXUgkCgfz

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 21:10:26 |
  2. URL |
  3. Taylor_South_Dakota #uVsNH3/o
  4. [ 編集]

GjvbdOnoigEkBW

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 22:04:49 |
  2. URL |
  3. Victoria_Wyoming #ZAiXV52w
  4. [ 編集]

tpWWrdzfIknOD

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/24(日) 22:59:03 |
  2. URL |
  3. Paige_Nevada #zdy9ltbk
  4. [ 編集]

hOyrXifEQuz

That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 00:22:04 |
  2. URL |
  3. Hailey_North_Dakota #Hs14FlzU
  4. [ 編集]

xBJUdNTkGpMgYO

I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 01:29:11 |
  2. URL |
  3. Emily_Utah #FnI8Fpow
  4. [ 編集]

UyglftBumFaQqJ

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 02:38:43 |
  2. URL |
  3. Layla_Oregon #Ptc/8XHE
  4. [ 編集]

WVcaFZfqdugiRW

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 04:01:58 |
  2. URL |
  3. Layla_Alabama #LHkkrc1M
  4. [ 編集]

rcwdqvKvupydxyk

I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 05:33:49 |
  2. URL |
  3. Emily_Louisiana #cS3I1Ngw
  4. [ 編集]

BhYNoVHYICXqZ

Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 07:06:16 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ella_North_Carolina #/pWaVapM
  4. [ 編集]

rAozicpLiDCwAEiim

That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 08:39:03 |
  2. URL |
  3. Lucy_Colorado #tl7pBG6I
  4. [ 編集]

zeTblcnHxoKzMtShML

In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 10:00:38 |
  2. URL |
  3. Mackenzie_Idaho #Xi91hp2Q
  4. [ 編集]

fZBzkKSHpwchMXnArme

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 11:15:15 |
  2. URL |
  3. Emma_New_Hampshire #zsUar67A
  4. [ 編集]

eAbriiPzrV

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 12:24:51 |
  2. URL |
  3. Caroline_Nebraska #.p5OQDO2
  4. [ 編集]

wnQjprSfYHntTCprE

That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 13:32:11 |
  2. URL |
  3. Stella_Utah #Hlp2yxNY
  4. [ 編集]

ZozUbgbDmPoMwB

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 14:41:04 |
  2. URL |
  3. Samantha_Missouri #SiiF/29Q
  4. [ 編集]

WHmpSDYthAtUNdkk

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 15:51:28 |
  2. URL |
  3. Melanie_South_Carolina #75AG6OsA
  4. [ 編集]

ajuvEfYlDc

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 17:00:35 |
  2. URL |
  3. Aubrey_Mississippi #5eTEK5J6
  4. [ 編集]

MJKIOYYbYF

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 18:10:30 |
  2. URL |
  3. Molly_North_Carolina #WLrsRBHA
  4. [ 編集]

fWKFyhJfHTPQETQKc

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 19:21:54 |
  2. URL |
  3. Samantha_Alabama #ChL99Xuk
  4. [ 編集]

pCvhinpNgdlG

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 21:02:43 |
  2. URL |
  3. Naomi_Georgia #QNsG3PU.
  4. [ 編集]

aROjvvBDgJx

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 21:11:50 |
  2. URL |
  3. Genesis_Maine #YfWpdWuQ
  4. [ 編集]

RhyxmmZrfbVUw

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 22:27:10 |
  2. URL |
  3. Evelyn_Ohio #ZpYFv6Do
  4. [ 編集]

cPVezBgRXLdQuA

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 22:31:53 |
  2. URL |
  3. Claire_North_Dakota #1RsQn.Fs
  4. [ 編集]

yXQQtKGSdgLornMQ

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 23:44:46 |
  2. URL |
  3. Zoe_Wyoming #drjCmLHk
  4. [ 編集]

yngKbldFgkTuz

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
  1. 2012/06/25(月) 23:58:52 |
  2. URL |
  3. Gabrielle_Washington #vZhfX.H.
  4. [ 編集]

DKagTbAhPM

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 00:57:47 |
  2. URL |
  3. Anna_Maine #foGm.Iao
  4. [ 編集]

mPxGWUQNZt

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 01:25:01 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ella_Louisiana #VlmsBuzU
  4. [ 編集]

MbyhtmQJjmU

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 02:15:10 |
  2. URL |
  3. Aaliyah_Kansas #Ex/ubp.M
  4. [ 編集]

vjLvvKdhxkJXnXZSOk

And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 02:54:59 |
  2. URL |
  3. Nevaeh_Vermont #OlbgabT.
  4. [ 編集]

Dvegalgblf

Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 03:29:10 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kaylee_New_Jersey #pSlLwggI
  4. [ 編集]

rSVHooOXnqiVXNJ

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 04:27:01 |
  2. URL |
  3. Maya_Alaska #K8//ZRe2
  4. [ 編集]

qIeORUxGVeIWtjCqs

That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 04:44:53 |
  2. URL |
  3. Bailey_Missouri #FhoapL2s
  4. [ 編集]

rOyCzubXdXvz

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 05:55:55 |
  2. URL |
  3. Katherine_North_Dakota #QhtkszUM
  4. [ 編集]

WHdIjdmPBqQOvi

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 06:00:44 |
  2. URL |
  3. Anna_Nevada #A0aYbjnM
  4. [ 編集]

QtKhHlwZFfcfo

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 07:19:13 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sydney_Wisconsin #FsJlBIy.
  4. [ 編集]

SHvlnXWZOTgpPnuZA

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 07:26:28 |
  2. URL |
  3. Paige_Kansas #7MTEUmks
  4. [ 編集]

vwRgHIsLlzuFT

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 08:35:31 |
  2. URL |
  3. Allison_Indiana #xU4leGlI
  4. [ 編集]

iZOKGZASGP

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 08:53:28 |
  2. URL |
  3. Avery_New_Jersey #T7ZE8T3E
  4. [ 編集]

dLZPoMaWRqNyQPSnD

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 09:50:22 |
  2. URL |
  3. Elizabeth_Kansas #JSu2AyQ6
  4. [ 編集]

VUzlyzUlkdgD

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 10:18:21 |
  2. URL |
  3. Peyton_Vermont #6y1HDy5o
  4. [ 編集]

xTAdlazyLjOf

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 11:00:56 |
  2. URL |
  3. Evelyn_Connecticut #ore.CrGE
  4. [ 編集]

kwiVYNFalZmhMZZTXSn

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 11:39:56 |
  2. URL |
  3. Amelia_Utah #vKxoTOKI
  4. [ 編集]

OoSpHqxpUEIArV

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 12:15:49 |
  2. URL |
  3. Naomi_Rhode_Island #o9ludLXo
  4. [ 編集]

ppJpcIXvXqINhA

I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 13:07:17 |
  2. URL |
  3. Claire_South_Dakota #Uask0a8U
  4. [ 編集]

OUhbdnhFHuCT

And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 13:31:13 |
  2. URL |
  3. Evelyn_Missouri #RHiAVkDM
  4. [ 編集]

ibuuhMWGLQaAdQZ

That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 14:33:24 |
  2. URL |
  3. Riley_Utah #hSEg4dpQ
  4. [ 編集]

WSvUqxotaBhsrBHMDqU

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 14:43:18 |
  2. URL |
  3. Arianna_Missouri #lldTbxd.
  4. [ 編集]

xevSJgkujPIkGSreM

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 15:57:24 |
  2. URL |
  3. Genesis_New_Hampshire #qaSMdu4o
  4. [ 編集]

rFsbRlUnUknQLPqZjK

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 15:57:26 |
  2. URL |
  3. Trinity_Georgia #w/uCx0fc
  4. [ 編集]

GPPmhCdRXUOgYA

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 17:13:53 |
  2. URL |
  3. Morgan_Idaho #lX/4gCys
  4. [ 編集]

WcmXZGEjFFxruZroc

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 17:26:46 |
  2. URL |
  3. Hannah_Michigan #KDoH9UNA
  4. [ 編集]

bUClEOwTthhJfTu

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 18:29:00 |
  2. URL |
  3. Caroline_Mississippi #wbE9pijA
  4. [ 編集]

RETYihQfslvDYJE

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 18:54:50 |
  2. URL |
  3. Claire_North_Carolina #raK6rrOw
  4. [ 編集]

qjbFhqlpHtN

In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 19:41:46 |
  2. URL |
  3. Taylor_Ohio #9oNr87kc
  4. [ 編集]

CuYlMIayQQ

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 20:15:39 |
  2. URL |
  3. Lillian_Kentucky #3FUSADTk
  4. [ 編集]

xJIYFsdpxozdQvK

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 20:53:56 |
  2. URL |
  3. Abigail_Vermont #9TvNquKI
  4. [ 編集]

dDNjOmyaVAXHdbSLf

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 21:44:18 |
  2. URL |
  3. Bella_Indiana #kOWLMyEA
  4. [ 編集]

KxddSKMtxbRdqRX

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 22:05:02 |
  2. URL |
  3. Andrea_Ohio #i26CtyF6
  4. [ 編集]

sJbtYyFCXEtAYHOZLUw

I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 23:14:34 |
  2. URL |
  3. Riley_Utah #i/RSAyEw
  4. [ 編集]

NqaKTqQSzAPGjBY

In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
  1. 2012/06/26(火) 23:22:15 |
  2. URL |
  3. Stella_New_Jersey #GvU4KmT2
  4. [ 編集]

rMtbLdIzNIjmBWOqiU

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 00:38:57 |
  2. URL |
  3. Emily_Tennessee #H0nfSgFU
  4. [ 編集]

zsLZccmXBDRrIu

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 00:46:02 |
  2. URL |
  3. Khloe_Massachusetts #Wd9YWV0E
  4. [ 編集]

spfEvhdHRS

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 01:53:17 |
  2. URL |
  3. Anna_Florida #8Fi8EYNY
  4. [ 編集]

WwJLpWaxOOUtteDq

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 02:12:24 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alyssa_Alabama #on61IlKQ
  4. [ 編集]

JvQDIVyTkxoVzPGZkhZ

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 02:59:59 |
  2. URL |
  3. Evelyn_Wyoming #4UYQQl9U
  4. [ 編集]

RBRIjBSpLSEzMaOWSZ

That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 03:41:03 |
  2. URL |
  3. Madison_Mississippi #puWv.lrA
  4. [ 編集]

qApcgwjYYhKVPd

That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 04:15:46 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ava_Hawaii #snZxmlyA
  4. [ 編集]

DViFUYoiUXhgNSoIFm

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 05:09:02 |
  2. URL |
  3. Hannah_Hawaii #e2WeHGTw
  4. [ 編集]

wilDVFsHyZYtmH

Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 05:28:52 |
  2. URL |
  3. Emily_New_York #q/Q6HcdI
  4. [ 編集]

thWdjTWwliXztw

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 06:27:11 |
  2. URL |
  3. Elizabeth_Mississippi #vtEcsnWo
  4. [ 編集]

RxLShANKtRRvb

Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 06:38:05 |
  2. URL |
  3. Autumn_Pennsylvania #cVlivYsE
  4. [ 編集]

lIaIYHDzzgAsgZkKoHv

In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 07:53:40 |
  2. URL |
  3. Autumn_Iowa #mmZllInE
  4. [ 編集]

twbcRgWcFdMjAHleBO

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 07:54:26 |
  2. URL |
  3. Lauren_Massachusetts #GmXnMI32
  4. [ 編集]

BXRJPSbAdvSBGBtj

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 09:07:25 |
  2. URL |
  3. Bella_West_Virginia #sD2X7kVQ
  4. [ 編集]

UZlCVjzxtkrDBAkJnsW

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 09:19:01 |
  2. URL |
  3. Maya_South_Dakota #AQDOHzi.
  4. [ 編集]

gBOKfyufXzVE

The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 10:13:31 |
  2. URL |
  3. Angelina_Wyoming #DxOVgHuM
  4. [ 編集]

UPmRzTheFxJrJvnQHTu

I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 10:38:20 |
  2. URL |
  3. Isabella_Maine #yjf32rTQ
  4. [ 編集]

FuazavVOMazKJ

And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 11:29:06 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alexis_Ohio #ea6PD2wY
  4. [ 編集]

YAcVOsMMFEtOhN

I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 12:06:32 |
  2. URL |
  3. Mia_Minnesota #1zA73zIs
  4. [ 編集]

xSRiPeQdnDoslmUGBiC

And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 12:45:25 |
  2. URL |
  3. Sofia_Nebraska #Qsc2e1QI
  4. [ 編集]

RpPTZeAXhaDrWUu

Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment party and the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 13:33:05 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ava_Oklahoma #atC7w946
  4. [ 編集]

sbujGSKyOATcOATh

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 14:01:11 |
  2. URL |
  3. Samantha_Oregon #6rSnHUZI
  4. [ 編集]

YfxPgoqJxZSdqY

In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 15:00:02 |
  2. URL |
  3. Audrey_Idaho #kffOH6vY
  4. [ 編集]

TJniJGsENJRMmBrIvL

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 15:19:30 |
  2. URL |
  3. Mia_Mississippi #jGf6tNFE
  4. [ 編集]

nZaQHRDiXVJuOpd

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 16:28:52 |
  2. URL |
  3. Khloe_Idaho #bBnlFQEI
  4. [ 編集]

ZEUJzPffZztVMIFp

I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a good solution.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 17:06:18 |
  2. URL |
  3. Molly_New_Mexico #jlaoZ.RQ
  4. [ 編集]

fQNZiwrcmnOMN

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 17:51:43 |
  2. URL |
  3. Bailey_Florida #vVkVNoOE
  4. [ 編集]

pHyuRxVMAHCWAVuhGek

That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 18:31:16 |
  2. URL |
  3. Autumn_Georgia #57B5dbUE
  4. [ 編集]

SsZwHDGHUpAaNkQPM

In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 19:17:38 |
  2. URL |
  3. Payton_North_Dakota #GL1ya9po
  4. [ 編集]

IFINumGGDK

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 20:05:44 |
  2. URL |
  3. Payton_Indiana #nqbeDhxY
  4. [ 編集]

ZinKFkVSxblryQ

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 20:43:17 |
  2. URL |
  3. Olivia_Massachusetts #hizGWruU
  4. [ 編集]

YKWjQhaNXuCNzyAcC

And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 21:42:42 |
  2. URL |
  3. Destiny_Louisiana #5Nov0Fo2
  4. [ 編集]

pWbkDItgRQLa

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 22:43:02 |
  2. URL |
  3. Addison_Vermont #zxoUjpV2
  4. [ 編集]

MOmuhuvLYUlWaIntYWx

I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.,
  1. 2012/06/27(水) 23:28:08 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kayla_New_Hampshire #EPeH0xRA
  4. [ 編集]

DsvEiwxJyVcasjsP

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 00:44:10 |
  2. URL |
  3. Aaliyah_New_York #UzTODvHs
  4. [ 編集]

FfGBjslihJlEx

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 01:16:38 |
  2. URL |
  3. Peyton_Kentucky #x151L3NU
  4. [ 編集]

tnZILAZgGuIDcQ

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 02:40:46 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ava_South_Dakota #f69lQLJk
  4. [ 編集]

hZgipeQgoDxstqjFl

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.,
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 02:55:03 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kaitlyn_Kentucky #icv7AnEg
  4. [ 編集]

gsBRoCaIZvGqudrPb

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 04:32:26 |
  2. URL |
  3. Andrea_Florida #xLdUO5hs
  4. [ 編集]

ZtZNYEXZrrZwp

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 04:32:27 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jasmine_Missouri #VqjjNOTo
  4. [ 編集]

coKlXxOJhcY

Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 06:12:10 |
  2. URL |
  3. Trinity_Connecticut #RbxDzvO6
  4. [ 編集]

kgGlWWBVNMwX

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 06:31:52 |
  2. URL |
  3. Destiny_Pennsylvania #EfD0cN0o
  4. [ 編集]

TRDqNXCcZNLG

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 07:43:39 |
  2. URL |
  3. Zoey_Ohio #GHsS9q5U
  4. [ 編集]

RmRpdxbOfVAwQzYVZAh

I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 08:29:07 |
  2. URL |
  3. Evelyn_Mississippi #H/UP0gKE
  4. [ 編集]

KBWSzdlukBnIIQWHjo

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 10:26:37 |
  2. URL |
  3. Aubrey_Massachusetts #GgpaftN6
  4. [ 編集]

psXQlnlAqSw

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 11:11:24 |
  2. URL |
  3. Natalie_Alaska #p3WEm1hY
  4. [ 編集]

qRppURLlgsTjMZF

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 12:29:07 |
  2. URL |
  3. Mia_Illinois #8ynYQuwY
  4. [ 編集]

unzpTEMxdgbUXg

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 14:31:39 |
  2. URL |
  3. Audrey_Illinois #EsMM2o.Y
  4. [ 編集]

BLfSWQJpCNezEQ

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 16:28:02 |
  2. URL |
  3. Jessica_Connecticut #2Omdaqqc
  4. [ 編集]

TlQMeXyjzKCnWlCAPHO

In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.,
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 18:36:40 |
  2. URL |
  3. Mackenzie_Hawaii #XXf8yNGk
  4. [ 編集]

MuzIXJihYV

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 20:38:23 |
  2. URL |
  3. Mackenzie_Colorado #hIYtELIc
  4. [ 編集]

zZEgWrzJUzR

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/28(木) 22:42:25 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kimberly_Indiana #Ri/RN0Lc
  4. [ 編集]

jcfmmACDmljcIAe

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,
  1. 2012/06/29(金) 00:46:31 |
  2. URL |
  3. Payton_Montana #sdVuELVE
  4. [ 編集]

wLkryGydnxHhcn

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
  1. 2012/06/29(金) 02:52:44 |
  2. URL |
  3. Alyssa_Nevada #H3RtEI4A
  4. [ 編集]

SnfzROSKrHhjxuWJj

That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*),
  1. 2012/06/29(金) 04:49:10 |
  2. URL |
  3. Olivia_Maryland #D33ef7f.
  4. [ 編集]

ALShoNpJMMArrvLnd

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,
  1. 2012/06/29(金) 06:54:23 |
  2. URL |
  3. Samantha_Georgia #QMTHJI6s
  4. [ 編集]

QRAuYJwAKlRJyk

I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
  1. 2012/06/29(金) 08:47:04 |
  2. URL |
  3. Genesis_Maryland #QXxdKHfA
  4. [ 編集]

xYsZtRPoMBRnyT

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,
  1. 2012/06/29(金) 10:40:03 |
  2. URL |
  3. Emma_Michigan #M9wSJNUo
  4. [ 編集]

YPYHQKfBIRSkedwMvM

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
  1. 2012/06/29(金) 12:39:08 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ariana_Nevada #qInoTzjM
  4. [ 編集]

fLzHhrSBOXfpeJs

I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).,
  1. 2012/06/29(金) 14:34:27 |
  2. URL |
  3. Maya_Connecticut #wtxOkXpQ
  4. [ 編集]

nRtSSDLVbdkWouZUsqr

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,
  1. 2012/06/29(金) 16:27:38 |
  2. URL |
  3. Samantha_Wyoming #oC6b7uYs
  4. [ 編集]

JYZYrqEvkgGjwDqXilg

I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.,
  1. 2012/06/29(金) 17:40:21 |
  2. URL |
  3. Ava_West_Virginia #0tRxxG9w
  4. [ 編集]

TcMRimLlXryXlEcxGlD

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
  1. 2012/06/29(金) 17:47:32 |
  2. URL |
  3. Brooklyn_Arizona #gqOqGp6s
  4. [ 編集]

dDSNjlihdOD

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
  1. 2012/06/29(金) 19:41:53 |
  2. URL |
  3. Mariah_Tennessee #n1Hkf3BA
  4. [ 編集]

mBjeSRQzRSfnnP

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
  1. 2012/06/29(金) 21:51:43 |
  2. URL |
  3. Stella_New_Mexico #/FTzci1.
  4. [ 編集]

RczewTaRgSwYWSwG

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
  1. 2012/06/29(金) 22:05:46 |
  2. URL |
  3. Eva_Mississippi #6xvS9aQg
  4. [ 編集]

sNIeAEXnYaHf

Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,
  1. 2012/06/30(土) 00:07:22 |
  2. URL |
  3. Bailey_Wisconsin #dabDkbhY
  4. [ 編集]

yYPbIRQQXdrcd

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),
  1. 2012/06/30(土) 02:21:19 |
  2. URL |
  3. Riley_New_Hampshire #veFWK3bI
  4. [ 編集]

ACZSOROTJLN

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/06/30(土) 02:28:49 |
  2. URL |
  3. Madelyn_Colorado #iOYNUdUA
  4. [ 編集]

kjakbsKdNlIQtkE

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,
  1. 2012/06/30(土) 04:37:57 |
  2. URL |
  3. Aubrey_Nebraska #ncx3YR72
  4. [ 編集]

zOTzcbheUYgmYUENJye

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,
  1. 2012/06/30(土) 04:41:43 |
  2. URL |
  3. Leah_Illinois #F5aeYk1w
  4. [ 編集]

mYsqTULLoZ

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
  1. 2012/06/30(土) 08:54:22 |
  2. URL |
  3. Evelyn_Virginia #1KSIdzEg
  4. [ 編集]

nUpZTOPJRjfOw

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/06/30(土) 08:58:07 |
  2. URL |
  3. Makayla_New_Mexico #x9owuFyk
  4. [ 編集]

UnXpCgHhDJMKC

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
  1. 2012/06/30(土) 11:05:27 |
  2. URL |
  3. Lillian_North_Dakota #6odNL18w
  4. [ 編集]

zprAXcATzXnWB

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,
  1. 2012/06/30(土) 15:20:40 |
  2. URL |
  3. Gianna_Kansas #zhwQYkY6
  4. [ 編集]

xgOvTRkrEhQ

I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
  1. 2012/06/30(土) 15:48:51 |
  2. URL |
  3. Brianna_Arizona #y9HjxrFQ
  4. [ 編集]

RoVAnlERCsCCAdz

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
  1. 2012/06/30(土) 17:33:12 |
  2. URL |
  3. Kylie_Idaho #OS/qKGvo
  4. [ 編集]

AMALqtmMMHkvMn

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,
  1. 2012/06/30(土) 19:42:30 |
  2. URL |
  3. Mackenzie_Florida #5cJmG0jE
  4. [ 編集]

HqeZhUcYtq

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/30(土) 21:45:55 |
  2. URL |
  3. Brooke_Connecticut #SYFFYRRs
  4. [ 編集]

bVajhRlqukHQOVY

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,
  1. 2012/06/30(土) 22:27:36 |
  2. URL |
  3. Claire_North_Dakota #2s2m8ibg
  4. [ 編集]

WrdmdPkGQNXpUrPJkfo

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/06/30(土) 23:51:59 |
  2. URL |
  3. Taylor_Utah #1gSxvDdA
  4. [ 編集]

xSbNjBsNbycHH

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,
  1. 2012/07/01(日) 11:29:47 |
  2. URL |
  3. Khloe_Colorado #5XvNEtyA
  4. [ 編集]

wWkRQSHfQYchaEIR

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,
  1. 2012/07/01(日) 16:43:55 |
  2. URL |
  3. Khloe_Montana #y5TJtS7U
  4. [ 編集]

hkVbxsFUspmf

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,
  1. 2012/07/10(火) 10:47:45 |
  2. URL |
  3. Zoey_Alabama #/.T6AQxQ
  4. [ 編集]

RGAipxSSDsfXWApAqH

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate McLame would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,
  1. 2012/07/10(火) 14:42:51 |
  2. URL |
  3. Camila_Iowa #0iHmREJE
  4. [ 編集]

WxbpaxVXjRugHg

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,
  1. 2012/07/10(火) 16:49:38 |
  2. URL |
  3. Savannah_Idaho #u513cH/U
  4. [ 編集]

UkzmEjsQyqAhht

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),
  1. 2012/07/11(水) 13:43:26 |
  2. URL |
  3. Autumn_Indiana #FPz1EjO.
  4. [ 編集]

fxRRNMtgidTeiIPLsKj

XeIZol <a href="http://zpvqyjyyskaj.com/">zpvqyjyyskaj</a>, [url=http://smfllnbxmjzb.com/]smfllnbxmjzb[/url], [link=http://msuanyeelgio.com/]msuanyeelgio[/link], http://pbbuxmcixbno.com/
  1. 2012/11/23(金) 22:29:53 |
  2. URL |
  3. srdpciw #ap2d1UJo
  4. [ 編集]

コメントの投稿


管理者にだけ表示を許可する

トラックバック

トラックバックURLはこちら
http://hastalavistababies.blog74.fc2.com/tb.php/99-f8cf1472
この記事にトラックバックする(FC2ブログユーザー)
上記広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。新しい記事を書くことで広告を消せます。